<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>originalthinking &#187; strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.originalthinking.com/category/strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.originalthinking.com</link>
	<description>business &#038; entrepreneurship in the post-web era</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 18:00:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>One-eyed kings</title>
		<link>http://www.originalthinking.com/2007/10/one-eyed-kings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.originalthinking.com/2007/10/one-eyed-kings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arnold Wytenburg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Eric McLuhan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marshall McLuhan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.originalthinking.com/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most failed entrepreneurial ventures and other creative efforts don&#8217;t make it for the simple reason that the people behind them literally can&#8217;t see the thing they&#8217;re trying to come to terms with. It isn&#8217;t that we can&#8217;t see anything at all, in fact the problem is that because we can see so much, we imagine [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most failed entrepreneurial ventures and other creative efforts don&#8217;t make it for the simple reason that the people behind them literally can&#8217;t see the thing they&#8217;re trying to come to terms with. It isn&#8217;t that we can&#8217;t see anything at all, in fact the problem is that <em>because we can see so much, we imagine that we see it all.</em></p>
<p>We&#8217;re so accustomed to being overwhelmed by information that we don&#8217;t even notice the fact we can hardly see past the ends of our noses. We suffer from a form of  &#8217;sighted blindness&#8217; that lets us imagine we see forests and landscapes when it&#8217;s really all just more trees.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;If you are really curious about the future, just study the present. What we ordinarily see is really what appears in the rearview mirror. What we ordinarily think of as the present is really the past. This habit of seeing back one stage when thinking that one is looking at the present is an age-old human habit.&#8221;<br />
<em>Marshall McLuhan</em></p></blockquote>
<p>In this digitally mediated post-web era, we face a new sort of business reality that radically challenges prior notions of what is what, when is when, who is who, and why is why.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re now faced with a need to develop and extend our capacities for abstraction in ways that push the limits of current understanding to a place where meaning and message form a singular, compressed, indivisible, complex whole. This is a place where conventional ideas of individuality and identity are at the same time destroyed and re-invented.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The instantaneous world of electric information media involves all of us, all at once. Ours is a brand-new world of all-at-onceness. Time, in a sense, has ceased and space has vanished: we now live in a global village of our own making, a simultaneous happening.&#8221;<br />
<em>Marshall McLuhan</em></p></blockquote>
<p>New &#8220;rules&#8221; are needed: The key to innovating, leading, and thriving in this abstract and inherently malleable (read: chaotic) context is to develop an extreme facility with ambiguity and uncertainty.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the nature of ambiguity and uncertainty to insist on defying conventional thinking about identity and persistence. It demands that entrepreneurs, innovators, and business leaders alike become skilled at what can be thought of as &#8220;trying to bite your own teeth,&#8221; a feat that requires the ability to interact and participate within our world in uncharted ways that call for sometimes entirely new forms of imagination and experimentation.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The meaning of meaning is meaning.&#8221;<br />
<em>Marshall McLuhan</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Coming to terms with a &#8216;contingent present&#8217; is no trivial task. Nowhere have I come across anyone as insightful and articulate about the nature and implications of a digitally mediated post-web world than in good friend and sometime colleague Eric McLuhan.</p>
<p>Eric does an excellent job of setting the stage and laying out the basic principles of the post-web digital era for entrepreneurs, innovators, and leaders alike in a <a target="blank" href="http://slcn.tv/media-ecology-eric-mcluhan" title="SLCN interview with Eric McLuhan - Quicktime required">recent interview</a> with <a target="blank" href="http://slcn.tv/programs/media-ecology" title="Second Life New Media Ecology interview series">Second Life Cable Network&#8217;s media ecology series</a> host <a target="blank" href="http://www.kennyhubble.com/" title="website for Kenny Hubble">Kenny Hubble.</a></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is <del>king.</del> an hallucinating idiot!&#8221;<br />
<e></e><em>originalthinking</em></p></blockquote>
<p>I recommend anyone with a business urge to give this interview the very worthwhile 75 minutes of your time and attention that it requires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.originalthinking.com/2007/10/one-eyed-kings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facing the competition</title>
		<link>http://www.originalthinking.com/2007/10/facing-the-competition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.originalthinking.com/2007/10/facing-the-competition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 21:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arnold Wytenburg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.originalthinking.com/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In almost any market, a business venture is faced with three principal types of competitor: primary, secondary, and tertiary. Each of these is distinguished by the nature and immediacy of the competitive threat they represent.
Primary competitors
This group includes companies who are solving the same problem as you are, using the same basic approach or technology. Primary [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In almost any market, a business venture is faced with three principal types of competitor: <em>primary, secondary, and tertiary.</em> Each of these is distinguished by the nature and immediacy of the competitive threat they represent.</p>
<h3>Primary competitors</h3>
<p>This group includes companies who are solving the same problem as you are, using the same basic approach or technology. Primary competitors are generally the most obvious threat in a marketplace. Nike is an obvious primary competitor for Adidas. Often, primary competitors are referred to as &#8220;direct competition.&#8221;</p>
<h3>Secondary competitors</h3>
<p>This group includes anyone who is solving the same problem as you, but is using an alternative solution. Secondary competitors are typically a little harder to spot than the direct competition. For example, Via Rail is a secondary competitor to Air Canada.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;A solution is the replacement of the current problem by the next level of problem.&#8221;<br />
<em>Kim James, management consultant &amp;complexity theorist</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Consider that sometimes your toughest &#8220;secondary competitor&#8221; might actually be your customer in the sense that their prior investment in the status quo acts as &#8220;indirect competition&#8221; for your offering.</p>
<h3>Tertiary competitors</h3>
<p>This group is made up of anyone who is not currently solving the same problem as you, but who is in a business position to do so with relative ease if sufficiently motivated. Often, they are much larger companies who tend to dominate entire industries and whose principal interests lie in ensuring a healthy overall economy and market &#8216;ecosystem&#8217;.</p>
<p>Tertiary competitors are seldom obvious at first but frequently become visible later in a venture&#8217;s business planning and implementation stages. Microsoft, Google, and Yahoo are examples of tertiary competitors for anyone who wants to operate in the online advertising marketplace.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Life may be short, but it can also be very wide.&#8221;<br />
<em>originalthinking</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Sometimes referred to as &#8220;distant competition,&#8221; these tertiary competitors are typically large and acquisitive, and ironically may at some future time simply buy you out rather than fight against you. For instance, Microsoft was once a tertiary competitor for fledging upstart Hotmail, which it decided to acquire - for a substantial sum of cash - rather than try to replicate.</p>
<p>However, it&#8217;s worth keeping in mind that a tertiary competitor could also just as easily freeze you out and shut you down. But then if you aren&#8217;t paying attention, so could any other competitor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.originalthinking.com/2007/10/facing-the-competition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
